APPENDIX V

The Impact of Teaching Thinking on the Eight Teachers involved in the Project

The action research that was carried out by the three thinking skills teachers in Malta between October 2000 and February 2001 describes the impact of the direct teaching of thinking on primary school pupils and on their class teachers. It was decided, however, to asses whether there had been any particular impact of teaching thinking on the eight teachers who were involved in the project. A questionnaire was prepared for this purpose and distributed to teachers in April 2001 (after the initial implementation phase). It is to be noted that the de Bono Thinking Skills were used by the teachers involved in the project and the project coordinators during a number of regular meetings. The following are the results of the questionnaires:

1. Use of the thinking skills (T.S.) in your work: Planning lessons and activities x 4 teachers

Evaluation of lessons and activities

Planning and evaluating a situation

To be more objective (PMI and CAF)

With time-tabling (FIP)

To sort out ideas

Decision making

For charts and worksheets

Integrated thinking skills in P.S.E. topics

2. Use of the thinking skills with your family: To take important decisions x 2

To see how others perceive a situation (OPV)

My two children have learnt to use the thinking tools

Priorities (FIP)

Goals and objectives (AGO)

Yes, not as often as I wish

No, adults are too set in their ways

No, distinction between work and family life

x 2

3. Use of thinking skills in your community: No, but aware of where I can apply them

No, not involved in community at the moment x 2

No, not much time for socialising at present

No, too busy

No, as others may not have heard of the skills

No, but I use them myself regarding the community

No, distinction between work and family life

4. Differences in how you teach thinking: More focussed, more strategic, more fun, more communicative and easier to organise group work

Move from teaching role to facilitating x 2

Since February more focus on transfer

More flexible re. content of lessons

More confident

Better thinking and different ideas

More time for pupils to think and reflect

Use of pictures (Y 1 – 3) to generate more ideas

More understanding of pupils’ ideas

More focus on objective

5. Differences for pupils in/out of classroom: Effective participation and easy collaboration

Learning is fun for the pupils x 3

Feedback from pupils re transfer of thinking skills

Unanimous interaction

Metacognitive thought is evident in class

Feedback from parent re use of T.S. at home and re. how pupils are learning to think

Parents should learn T.S. for better use outside class

Pupil feedback on use of T.S. outside class, eg decisions x 2

No evidence yet from outside classroom x 3

 

 

 

  1. PMI re implementation of T.S. through P.S.E.
  2. Plus:

    Most of the topics we deal with in P.S.E. link well to T.S.

    I am getting more confident with the content and the methodology and feel that my teaching of T.S. is proressively etting better.

    Thinking skills are very useful

    Very scheduled, organised, moving swiftly

    Children who have had thinking lessons discuss better during P.S.E. sessions and come up with a lot of ideas

    Pupils respond positively

    Pupils see T.S. as fun

    Class teachers welcomed the introduction of T.S.

    In the second part of the project (Feb – Jun) children already used to class set-up, to teacher, to timetable x 2

    Experience already gained teaching T.S. in the previous school (Oct – Jan)

    Children have matured a bit during the second part of the scholastic year (Feb – Jun)

    Minus:

    T.S. takes up a substantial amount of time from P.S.E. programme

    Contact with the pupils only once a week breaks the continuity of their exposure to T.S.

    Thinking skills should not be mistaken for P.S.E. skills

    Not as interesting as P.S.E. lessons which include more games.

    Thinking everything out can be boring!

    Children miss P.S.E. lessons x 2

    Short time spans for lessons, lessons could be longer

    Having a fixed room is best

    Children feel the change between P.S.E. and T.S.

    Interesting:

    Some children seem to prefer T.S. to P.S.E.

    It would be interesting to have some sessions for parents so as to recruit their efforts also in teaching thinking to the children

    Ask the children whether they have noticed the difference!

    I wonder whether all Malta will become more "creative and rational" thanks to thinking skills

    Perhaps P.S.E. teachers should teach only P.S.E. and thinking skills teachers only T.S. x 2

    Interesting to see how changes work out as the programme is developed and improved

    Interesting to introduce new ways of teaching thinking

    Each teacher, every child and every town are different and it is interesting to see different reactions

  3. How could better support be provided for the T.S. and experiential learning process?

It is evident that there are a number of issues which emerge in the responses of the teachers to the questionnaires which need to be dealt with in an attempt to develop and improve the implementation of the de Bono Thinking Skills project in Primary Schools. Amongst the more pressing issues which can be identified which should be addressed are the following: